Gus Cosio says so

Ideas on the Philippine Stock Market

Home on the range

6:15 pm  Tuesday   2 February  2010    Philippine Stock Exchange Index    2864.18  (-0.66)

Investors are probably perplexed today after seeing Wall Street stage a rally overnight yet seeing the PSEi going down.  It is even more discouraging that the local market opened higher only to invite further selling.  There’s been a number of issues that have gone through nearby support levels – AC, TEL, MEG, MER, FLI and PIP, to name a few.  I guess many are trying to figure out whether this is the beginning of the down trend, a major correction of the 2009 or simply a minor correction of the recent rise to 3121, the nearby peak of the market.

First, let’s look at the major or long-term trend.  Long term trends are normally determined by underlying economic fundamentals.  Is 2010 going to be better for the economy than 2009?  I think the answer is an unequivocal yes.  Imports and exports are recovering, domestic consumption is sustaining its growth, the global economy – led by the U.S., China, India and the rest of ASEAN – is expanding. Global liquidity is still growing albeit much slower than last year.  All of these point to a long-term positive effect to companies listed on the PSEi.

Next, let us have a feel on the intermediate term examining whether a major correction of the underlying trend is happening.  With the sell-off in stocks like AC,  TEL and MER and the pull back in stocks like MBT, BPI, AP, RLC, ALI, FGEN, EDC, FPH and a lot of the mid-cap stocks, what it looks like is a major correction is going on.  What has become obvious to me is the market’s reaction to the 3121 level of the index.  When the market failed to penetrate that level, people knew in their hearts that they have to protect the gains they made over the last few months.

Today, we have some stocks which have appeared to have broken down indicating that either a number of foreign portfolios are abandoning our market or a lot of local investors are significantly reducing exposures to equities.  Actually, I think nervousness has gone ahead of these fund mangers because whatever momentum had been built in the first few days of 2010 has been doused upon.  It looks to be money management time again.  I believe, however, that in the back of their minds most investors like the market and would be coming back when they see some stability in prices.  I think that it will be soon, but I do not see this market surging past the 3130 peak that we saw late in 2009 before the May elections.  I am suggesting that what we will be seeing are prices coming to support levels sooner than later and then establishing a trading range between 2800 and 3130.  That is a very comfortable 330 points or 12% price range.  That is a range worth trading.

I would suggest homework time again for investors, traders and punters alike.  In my experience, a trading range provides opportunities for out performance.  There are stocks that are cheap valuations wise already.  MBT and MPI are two examples; MPI should be worth at least 2.50 while MBT should be at least 44.  PIP and AGI might also be cheap as the stories behind them are quite interesting; PIP has a potential M&A with the global company and AGI because of the success of its resort across NAIA 3.  I would recommend investors to start scouring the market again for stocks with real value because there is money again to be made.


February 2, 2010 - Posted by | Financial markets in Asia


  1. Sir, what do you think of Splash? I think IPO price is at 8 pesos and many stocks have reached 50% of their 2007 price already but unfornately, sph was left behind….Do you think it is good to buy splash now at this level?

    Thanks so much…It was just yesterday that I saw your site..It is very informative..

    Comment by jolly | February 3, 2010 | Reply

    • Jolly,
      There was a lot of enthusiasm for SPH last november because people thought that a large fund who was putting together a small cap portfolio was going to pick up a chunk of these shares. I think that the fund decided to postpone its purchase possibly because there was no major highlight in its financial operations. There had also been some movements in the company’s top management which may indicate that the company is trying to overcome some management and operational hurdles. Personally, I like the stock for a 6 to 12 months view. If you are buying it for a quick trade, I would suggest you look at something else, perhaps MPI or EDC which a better to trade. If you are looking for something to stick into your portfolio, SPH would be a good buy slightly below today’s price, maybe at 2.70. One thing I am almost certain of is that they will pay around 21 centavos dividend a year.

      Comment by Gus Cosio | February 4, 2010 | Reply

  2. Hello Gus. Your insights are very helpful. Have a few queries:

    1. Whats your take on CPM? The stock had a free fall for the last 3 trading sessions. I offloaded all my CPM stocks yesterday at 4.5 at a loss (bought them at 4.9) Today, it went down almost 10%, which compelled me to buy at 4.1. Its currently trading at 4.15-4.2, but the volume is quite thin on both buying and selling side. Whats your fearless forecast on CPM?

    2. Whats your take on MEG? Do you think it will still go down from its current price of 1.2?

    3. Whats your take on GEO? I bought GEO last week at .75, its now trading at .65, down more than 13%. Do you think GEO will continue to fall and hence, I should cut my losses now?

    Thanks in advance for your insight. Cheers

    Comment by Czar | February 3, 2010 | Reply

  3. Czar,
    On CPM, this stock is not moved by fundamentals so it is difficult for me to give you an intelligent answer. The supply is controlled by an insider group so they can squeeze the stock and let it go as they please. Better if you find someone in the group for information.
    On MEG, it looks very cheap at this level but that is no guarantee that it will go up soon. I think anxiety has built up on property stocks at the moment.
    GEO has the same situation as CPM. Both of them were listed “by way of introduction” which means supply of shares were slowly released by the issuer to the market giving them the ability to drive up and sell down the price. I find these stocks dangerous until they become regular, i.e. they do a proper IPO to the public with larger number of shares available to the market.

    Comment by Gus Cosio | February 4, 2010 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: